Skip to content

Conversation

@fischer-ncar
Copy link
Collaborator

@fischer-ncar fischer-ncar commented Oct 25, 2025

Description of changes

ERR test needs to be added back in here so that the correct history files are copied back for the restart.
This was original added in #582, but accidently removed in #597.

Specific notes

Are changes expected to change answers? bfb

Testing performed

ERR_Ln9.ne16pg3_ne16pg3_mt232.FHISTC_LTso.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq9s_bwic
ERR_Ld5.ne30pg3_t232.B1850C_LTso.derecho_gnu.allactive-defaultio
ERR_Ld7.f10_f10_mg37.IHistClm60BgcCrop.derecho_gnu.clm-default
ERR_Ld7.f10_f10_mg37.IHistClm60BgcCrop.derecho_gnu.drv-interim_restart

@fischer-ncar
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@briandobbins @billsacks since Jim is out this week, can either one of you review this PR.

Thanks

@billsacks
Copy link
Member

@fischer-ncar - can you explain this change? In your description, you say, "Need to write restarts at the end of the run for ERR tests." But my understanding of the code change is that it does the opposite - i.e., skips writing restart files at the end of the run. Can you clarify the intent of the change, and also why this change is needed? I also want to confirm that this isn't circumventing some aspect of the robustness of this test - e.g., the robustness added by @jedwards4b in ESMCI/cime#4829: I'm wondering if what's really needed is a fix to some logic. I want to clarify that I don't understand the intent of this test well enough to know one way or the other, but just want to better understand the rationale / justification for this change before approving.

@fischer-ncar
Copy link
Collaborator Author

fischer-ncar commented Oct 28, 2025

@billsacks You're correct, I had the logic reversed in my head. I've updated the description for a better explanation of what is going on. PR #582 added this line, then PR #597 accidently removed it.

Copy link
Member

@billsacks billsacks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the explanation and pointer to the history, @fischer-ncar !

@billsacks
Copy link
Member

@fischer-ncar - As far as I'm concerned, go ahead and merge whenever you're ready for this to come in. Thanks!

@fischer-ncar fischer-ncar merged commit 18eb93b into ESCOMP:main Oct 28, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants